-
Science-related populism is often used to undermine public trust in science. Good scientific practice contributes to public trust in science, whereas misconduct promotes public skepticism. Since research ethics are a […]
-
In an era of post-truth, the legitimacy of policy knowledge is questioned, especially in de-democratizing contexts where governments purposefully engage in post-truth politics to support their regimes. In such contexts, […]
-
In an era of post-truth, the legitimacy of policy knowledge is questioned, especially in de-democratizing contexts where governments purposefully engage in post-truth politics to support their regimes. In such contexts, […]
-
This study investigates how intentional news avoidance behavior is affected by the perceived negativity of news media and political trust and how the impact of news negativity is conditioned by […]
-
This review considers the Panel Discussion on Digital, Media and Information Literacy—Report of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, and explores the report’s key implications for […]
-
Science-related populism is often used to undermine public trust in science. Good scientific practice contributes to public trust in science, whereas misconduct promotes public skepticism. Since research ethics are a […]
-
Studies on misinformation often overlook people’s assessment of true information, focusing instead on beliefs in and sharing of false content. This is problematic, as it limits scholars’ ability to produce […]
-
Amongst growing public concern about climate change, right-wing populist actors often dismiss environmental concerns as part of an elitist, transnational agenda. At the same time, so-called alternative news media play […]
-
Understanding trust in experts and scientists is crucial, especially in testing the challenges posed by pre- and post-pandemic realities. Establishing trust in experts, scientists, and institutions is beset by challenges, […]
-
In recent years, affective polarization has reached issues that were (at least previously) considered apolitical (see Rudolph & Hetherington. Affective polarization in political and nonpolitical settings. International Journal of Public […]
