-
The digital age has created easy access to mass amounts of quickly changing news that people can share, discuss and research within online communities. These abilities have contributed to the […]
-
The crisis in Ukraine has accentuated the position of Russian television as the governmentâs strongest asset in its information warfare. The internet, however, allows other players to challenge the Kremlinâs […]
-
The terms âpost-truthâ and âfake newsâ have become increasingly prevalent in public discourse over the last year. This article explores the growing abundance of misinformation, how it influences people, and […]
-
Comments on an article by Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich K.H. Ecker & John Cook (see record 2017-57700-001). Based on combating misinformation, Lewandowsky et al. made narrow recommendations for future cognitive research, […]
-
A growing number of politicians are talking nonsense with impunity. False information is proliferating. What’s worse, the human brain loves it.
-
The present experiment (N=390) examined how people adjust their judgment after they learn that crucial information on which their initial evaluation was based is incorrect. In line with our expectations, […]
-
Large numbers of Americans endorse political rumors on surveys. But do they truly believe what they say? In this paper, I assess the extent to which subscription to political rumors […]
-
Can citizens heed factual information, even when such information challenges their partisan and ideological attachments? The âbackfire effect,â described by Nyhan and Reifler says no: rather than simply ignoring factual […]
-
Can citizens heed factual information, even when such information challenges their partisan and ideological attachments? The âbackfire effect,â described by Nyhan and Reifler (Polit Behav 32(2):303â330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2, 2010), says no: […]