Tribes and truths

Chapter 10 explores the dynamics of polarization, identity, and the rejection of evidence in conflicts over biodiversity. It emphasizes how the dismissal of evidence and science has led to entrenched positions and identity-based divisions, where parties become polarized, refusing to engage with opposing views. The chapter uses examples like the trophy hunting debate and ‘flat-earthers’ to illustrate how deeply held beliefs, even when counter to facts, become part of one’s identity. It also discusses how social media amplifies and accelerates polarization, turning conflicts into more extreme, identity-driven battles. Reconciliation in these cases requires acknowledging different truths and using dialogue to bridge divides. The chapter underscores the importance of empathy, listening, and understanding in resolving highly polarized conflicts, where evidence alone is not enough.