To Fund or Not to Fund? Examining Relationships Between Support for Scientific Research Across Political Ideologies and Science-Related Populist Beliefs

This study examined how political ideology and science-related populism (SciPop) relate to both trust in federal science agencies and support for scientific funding in the United States. Using regression models, we analyzed perceptions of CDC, NIH, NSF, and EPA, as well as attitudes toward taxpayer-funded research and early 2025 proposed budget cuts. Both conservatism and SciPop predicted lower trust and reduced support for science funding, with SciPop emerging as the stronger predictor. This highlights the importance of understanding how anti-elite sentiment shapes public attitudes toward science, offering insights for science communication amid growing polarization and declining trust in scientific institutions.