Effective science communication is essential to bridge the gap between science and the public, especially regarding complex, highly politicized topics such as climate mobility. This study examines the effectiveness of a Science Slam as a tool for communicating scientific evidence, a format often overlooked in the academic literature. A short survey was conducted before and after the Science Slams on climate mobility narratives, and a discussion was facilitated at the event’s conclusion. The findings reveal a significant impact of the Science Slams on the audience support for narratives addressed during the event, while the support for not-discussed narratives remained unchanged.