COVID-19 Misinformation and Disinformation on Social Networks – The Limits of Veritistic Countermeasures

The COVID-19 pandemic has been the subject of a vast amount of misinformation, partic-ularly in digital information environments, and major social media platforms recently pub-licized some of the countermeasures they are adopting. This presents an opportunity to ex-amine the nature of the misinformation and disinformation being produced, and the theo-retical and technological paradigm used to counter it. I argue that this approach is based on a conception of misinformation as epistemic pollution that can only justify a limited and potentially inadequate response , and that some of the measures undertaken in practice outrun this. In fact, social networks manage ecological and architectural conditions that influence discourse on their platforms in ways that should motivate reconsideration of the justifications that ground epistemic interventions to combat misinformation, and the types of intervention that they warrant. The editorial role of platforms should not be framed solely as the management of epistemic pollution, but instead as managing the epistemic en-vironment in which narratives and social epistemic processes take place. There is an ele-ment of inevitable epistemic paternalism involved in this, and exploration of the indepen-dent constraints on its justifiability can help determine proper limits of its exercise in practice.