BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//MediaWell - ECPv6.6.4.2//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://mediawell.ssrc.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for MediaWell
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20210314T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20211107T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20211013T130000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20211013T143000
DTSTAMP:20261016T122536
CREATED:20211001T134116Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211001T142156Z
UID:69249-1634130000-1634135400@mediawell.ssrc.org
SUMMARY:Lies and Elections | Knight First Amendment Institute
DESCRIPTION:How should the government regulate election-related speech? Trump’s “Big Lie” raises the question of whether lies about election results should be regulated by the social media platforms\, as well as the government. But of course\, these kinds of lies are not the only kinds of election-related lies that raise thorny free speech questions. Can or should foreign actors be able to intervene in electoral speech in the run-up to elections? How much should campaign finance law be used to patrol misinformation and disinformation about election donations and spending? Can there be stricter regulation of election-related speech without that justifying vote-suppressing laws targeting virtually nonexistent election fraud? More fundamentally\, how exceptional should we consider the electoral context when it comes to the regulation of lies? And how do race\, nationality\, and gender play into both election-related disinformation and its regulation?\n\n\n[…]\n\n end article metadata  \n end article social  \n end article body
URL:https://mediawell.ssrc.org/event/lies-and-elections-knight-first-amendment-institute/
CATEGORIES:Talk
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR